DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! thrattle is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

  • Subscribe

  • Community

  • Top Commenters

  • Popular Threads

  • Recent Comments

    • Hey dude, Whats up man? You seem to be lying low for a long time. Looks like you need a kick up your A$$ to pep you up. Cheers, Chandru.

      5 months ago by Chandru

      in Still on dump

    • '09 will indeed be good. hang in there 'til then :)

      6 months ago by Roopa

      in Still on dump

    • Has read with the pleasure, very interesting post, write still, good luck to you!

      7 months ago by free fta satellite keys

      in Real Satellite Pics of Dec 04′ Tsunami

    • Hey ranjith, wish u cud snap out of it .. The fox that cried 'sour grapes' didn't help itself much I guess. Your 'I'm OK' after all u have written is like windows displaying...

      7 months ago by Mohanr

      in Ran dumb dump

    • thats called life. its a cocktail of every thing. body is a heap of fickle minded atomic particles which cause all adjectives and actions. chilax and move on thats the best to get out this strange...

      8 months ago by adiya

      in Ran dumb dump

thrattle

Jump to original thread »
Author

Nano thoughts

Started by Ranjhith · 11 months ago

After several days of procrastination, here we go with Tata’s Nano. Was keeping tabs with the recent AutoExpo for 2 reasons, one was obviously for the people’s car, Nano.
At 1st glimpse, the Nano reminded me of a smart car that Russell Crowe rides in A Good Year. H ... Continue reading »

4 comments

  • Roopa

    1 year ago

    Nano would bring in safety of pedestrians...but only after several accidents and incidents? It means 'The Nano' will first increase the number of accidents on the road and then much later would bring peace n order on the road? That doesn't really sound like a "positive" impact to me? May be I should go into hibernation now. Once the "accidents n incidents" era is over and the "ordered-traffic" era sets in, please wake me up :)
    reply
  • Ranjhith

    1 year ago

    @Roopa
    > That doesn’t really sound like a “positive” impact to me?

    The accidents are like instantaneous values. They'll vary around a mean that is rising to be +ve. :)

    ok. If I honk, will you be able to wake up? :P
    reply
  • Sami

    1 year ago

    Nano should be allowed only after researching a lot about enviromnent, road safety etc. Indians erkanave romba ozhungu ! ithula ithu vera vandhutta, gaali thaan.
    This infrastructure is also too good in every nook and corner of india paarunga !

    Haiyaa naanum oru car vaanga porean range-ku thaan ellarum think panranga ! Enna irukku intha cars-la, Two wheeler-la driver panra mathiri varathu ! :)
    reply
  • Ranjhith

    1 year ago

    @Sami

    > Nano should be allowed only after

    Why so much a "partiality" with Nano? :) It was already said to be passing the emission norms & some crash testing. Ask the govt to give better roads, you got the right to ask, as you are gonna be paying the road taxes.

    > Two wheeler-la driver panra mathiri varathu

    எல்லாம் ஒரு கால் கட்டு போடர வரைக்கும்தான். :)
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login