thrattle - Latest Comments in Nano thoughts

Re: Nano thoughts

ranjhith — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:34:26 -0000

@Sami

> Nano should be allowed only after

Why so much a "partiality" with Nano? :) It was already said to be passing the emission norms & some crash testing. Ask the govt to give better roads, you got the right to ask, as you are gonna be paying the road taxes.

> Two wheeler-la driver panra mathiri varathu

எல்லாம் ஒரு கால் கட்டு போடர வரைக்கும்தான். :)

Re: Nano thoughts

Sami — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:22:40 -0000

Nano should be allowed only after researching a lot about enviromnent, road safety etc. Indians erkanave romba ozhungu ! ithula ithu vera vandhutta, gaali thaan.
This infrastructure is also too good in every nook and corner of india paarunga !

Haiyaa naanum oru car vaanga porean range-ku thaan ellarum think panranga ! Enna irukku intha cars-la, Two wheeler-la driver panra mathiri varathu ! :)

Re: Nano thoughts

ranjhith — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:52:28 -0000

@Roopa
> That doesn’t really sound like a “positive” impact to me?

The accidents are like instantaneous values. They'll vary around a mean that is rising to be +ve. :)

ok. If I honk, will you be able to wake up? :P

Re: Nano thoughts

Roopa — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:11:33 -0000

Nano would bring in safety of pedestrians...but only after several accidents and incidents? It means 'The Nano' will first increase the number of accidents on the road and then much later would bring peace n order on the road? That doesn't really sound like a "positive" impact to me? May be I should go into hibernation now. Once the "accidents n incidents" era is over and the "ordered-traffic" era sets in, please wake me up :)