<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>thrattle 2.0 - Latest Comments in Twentynine in 1two3ty1</title><link>http://thrattle.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thrattle.disqus.com/twentynine_in_1two3ty1/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:12:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twentynine in 1two3ty1</title><link>http://www.ranjhith.com/thrattle/twentynine-in-1two3ty1/#comment-1409867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Aparna&lt;br&gt;:) Going with the crowd.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Siva&lt;br&gt;It wasn't deliberate. I cudn't help with some right lighting. Bad composition. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ranjhith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twentynine in 1two3ty1</title><link>http://www.ranjhith.com/thrattle/twentynine-in-1two3ty1/#comment-1409866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i dont know if the lighting was deliberately high at 0 and then gradually reducing... maybe it could have been evenly distributed? was it that the flash was reflecting too much light if focussed evenly?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Siva</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twentynine in 1two3ty1</title><link>http://www.ranjhith.com/thrattle/twentynine-in-1two3ty1/#comment-1409865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;copy cat :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aparna</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:54:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>